Zia approval prediction failure even with customized data

Zia approval prediction failure even with customized data

Zia approval prediction is not working as expected even though the data is given under customized data.

Fix:

The customized model will be considered for the prediction at first and then if it fails to predict, the default model will be considered.

Reference Ticket: 


Jar Compatibility :
    11140 SDP Build version

      New to ADSelfService Plus?

        Resources

            • Related Articles

            • Zia prediction failure due to security statements at the front of email content

              Issue: Zia approval prediction fails when security statements are present at the starting of the mail content. Since we consider the first 100 characters and 2 sentences from the content, the approval comment given by the user was not considered due ...
            • Failure during Zia Reopen prediction process stops the mail fetching schedule

              When the requester replies to closed/resolved requests with empty content or if there is no proper content except the content of the parent mail, then no content will be available for zia reopen prediction process and an exception will be ...
            • Zia prediction fails due to signature content

              Issue: Zia Approval prediction is not working when the prediction query has signature in it. Log Trace: [12:15:08:465]|[07-05-2022]|[com.manageengine.servicedesk.sdpai.utils.ApprovalPrediction]|[INFO]|[147]: result::-1.0| ...
            • Zia Prediction Shows Rejected Due to Signature Content

              Issue: Zia Approval prediction is not working when the prediction query has signature in it. Fix: The proper approval comment and the signature has new line character(\n) in between them. So splitting the content into two and predicting the first ...
            • Custom Data Word Vector

              Issue: Zia Approval prediction is not working when the prediction query has signature and new words other than custom data present in it. Fix: -> The proper approval comment and the signature has new line character(\n) in between them. So splitting ...